Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
George Tsivadze vs Thomas Fancutt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tsivadze vs Fancutt analysis and find out who is favored!
George Tsivadze vs Thomas Fancutt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tsivadze 1 - 1 Fancutt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tsivadze has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Fancutt has won 49.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tsivadze, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fancutt has won 45.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tsivadze has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fancutt has saved 52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tsivadze has won 40% of matches played (W/L 2/ 3), with Fancutt winning 41.18% (W/L 14/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tsivadze has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 84/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13). Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Tsivadze has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3), where as Fancutt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tsivadze winning 1 times and Fancutt being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tsivadze winning 3 and Fancutt winning 2. The last match between Tsivadze and Fancutt was at the Georgia F3, 10-08-2016, Second, Clay with George Tsivadze getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tsivadze and Fancutt have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tsivadze winning 0 times and Fancutt 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tsivadze winning 0, and Fancutt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tsivadze has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Fancutt has played against players with an average rank of 162.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tsivadze has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fancutt has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tsivadze has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fancutt has converted 49.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
893
Rank
733
High
31
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
792
Rank
382
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
48% (160-170)
Career Total W/L
53% (228-200)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For George Tsivadze vs Thomas Fancutt For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tsivadze VS Fancutt
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | George Tsivadze | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 25 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (108/173) | 53% (78/146) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (75/108) | 69% (54/78) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (30/65) | 49% (33/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 16% (3/19) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (59/146) | 39% (68/173) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
George Tsivadze
Player
Thomas Fancutt
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
George Tsivadze
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | George Tsivadze | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (13/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (148/159) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.78 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 118 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:28:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 178.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (527/937) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (385/527) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (203/410) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (32/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (325/926) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
George Tsivadze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
George Tsivadze
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
George Tsivadze
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigoriy Lomakin
Player
George Tsivadze
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Orlov
Player
George Tsivadze
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve %
42%
(
8 of
19)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
11 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
28
Total Points Won
9
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco De Rossi
Player
George Tsivadze
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Tsivadze
Player
Ying Hou
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thomas Fancutt
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Leonid Sheyngezikht
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Etienne Niyigena
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Thomas Fancutt
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Francesco Ferrari
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thomas Fancutt
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Thomas Fancutt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tsivadze Vs Fancutt Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tsivadze are available here and Fancutt photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
